PROTO MATRIX OR SHOCKER W/ VISION?

[smartpartsfr3ak]

which gun is better? pros and cons of both guns.

[Russ7017]

Originally posted by smartpartsfr3ak@Jun 25 2005, 12:11 AM
which gun is better? pros and cons of both guns.
28541

Go with the shocker

[jimmy2222]

imo the proto matrix would rock a shocker, even a ton ton. protos are kinda like mini DM5's, shockers, are kin of gas hogs, and i find that protos have much better tweeking capabilities.

[paintballfr3ak]

i like the trix... but i do like the fact of a light marker and it is very nice looking... so i would have to say shocker, although i believe the Trix is better.

[yellowpumpguy]

They both throw ropes, so what does it matter? The Shocker throws plenty of paint in a smaller, lighter package, so I'm going to go with the Shocker.

[A5Gunner24]

I am going to have to say the shocker also :D

[pRo_cus[T]om]

i would go with a shocker but its pretty much your personal preverence

[pRo_cus[T]om]

w/e you think looks cooler

[LeTmEkNoWiRiSiStAbLe]

once you get up to high end guns, its really more personal preferance. the shocker,imo, looks better, and can has more potential. although its still bouncebeam eyes in the shocker, sp vision is very reliable. shockers can be highly upgraded. new boards, barrel, trigger,frame, reg, neck, bolt, bolt guide, asa,lpr, everything. there are for protos as well, but not as many readily available

and if you wanna look at it a different way,how many pro/nxl teams shoot shockers? dynasty, detroit strange, miami effect,phili americans, ton tons,xtreme, many others. how many shoot protos? not many.if at all

[supersniperII]

im gonna say the shocker. because its lighter.

[Adam Zawistowski]

ahhh, this is a tough question, i like the proto but i think the shocker is better. they're both pretty much even. B) pce